3D Printer

3D Printer is a tool used to build plastic parts for Seeker. Items are first drawn in CAD and then sent to the printer where they become real parts formed from plastic.

Comments

Sailing Performance Report Clips

Starts at 1:57

Inflexible Schedule Ends Expedition

Starts at 16:32

Anchor Winch Rebuild - Part 7 - Lost Wax Casting - Failure

Starts at 8:16

Pulling the Prop Shaft and Cutless Bearing in the Water

Starts at 18:50

George Graves said: Doug wants to prove the haters wrong and show that Seeker is a sailing machine. He's gonna use AI and cameras to do it. He talks a lot about "the trolls" in this video. Apparently, he's thinking a lot about his "haters" these days. FredTheSailor said: My money says we don't see the results of that because he's not gonna like what he discovers. YOU HEAR THAT, DUG? I DARE YOU TO PUBLISH THE FULL RESULTS. My prediction: you will hide some of these to conceal your lies: SOG, STW, VMG, wind speed, wind angle, Rudder Angle, sea state, sail state. (If she's so damn stable, why do you never carry full sail?) And after 5 years, we're still waiting for a full video of a gybe. We already know you cannot tack that heap.

Fred, I do not know what I have done that makes you think I would hide or lie about the results. If you have something specific, then say what it is. Hell, my videos are full of failures. I cast the capstans at least twelve times before getting them right, and I showed it. I have shown broken parts, bad ideas, mistakes, repairs, and repeated attempts throughout the entire project. I believe failures are one of our best resources for learning. A success tells you something worked. A failure often teaches you why it did not work and what needs to change. Hiding failures would defeat much of the reason I make these videos. I think people need to lean from their failures. A quick database search and running it through AI shows you have a crystal ball that is very prone to failure. October 2023, you predicted that one of Seeker’s trips would be measured in “three U-joints”:
https://forums.sailinganarchy.com/threads/sv-seeker.222077/post-8480070
You were not entirely wrong. We have broken two U-joints. I do not presently remember the dates or whether both happened during the same trip. The transfer case is currently removed. It will be carefully realigned when it is reinstalled because I believe alignment may be the underlying problem. I hope that fixes it, but I do not know that yet. If it fails again, I'll be happy to show it.

August 2025, you predicted that changing the cutless bearing would become an annual job:
https://forums.sailinganarchy.com/threads/sv-seeker.222077/post-9355313
More than three years later, that cutless bearing is still in good condition. That prediction? A failure.

March 2026, you repeated a list of predictions about the NURD equipment. They included catastrophic heel, failed hydraulic hoses, the operator not knowing when a hose failed, someone being blamed for it, and the equipment becoming caught and unrecoverable:
https://forums.sailinganarchy.com/threads/sv-seeker.222077/post-9766315
Wrong on all counts. Another Failure -- Learning opportunity as I like to think of them.

You have also used the absence of a video as proof that something did not happen. For example, you said that if I had properly cleared into another country, there would have been a video:
https://forums.sailinganarchy.com/threads/sv-seeker.222077/post-9832921I document a lot, but I do not make a video about everything. The absence of a video is not proof that something did or did not happen. And by the way I did make a video of not properly clearing into a country.

Do I enjoy proving people wrong? Yes. It motivates me when I get told I can't do something that I have and idea for doing. But I don't like proving you wrong, because I really don't get anything out of it. But maybe you will? Others certainly can. And it's a reminder to myself. Don't get too wrapped up in being right that you ignore the obvious. Wanting to prove someone wrong does not give me permission to ignore evidence I do not like or hide a failure. I will apply the same standard to success and failure. I will work to acknowledge accurate criticism, correct my mistakes, and say what evidence would change my conclusions. I expect anyone evaluating Seeker—including me—to be judged by those same standards. When the sailing results are published, if you find missing data, an error in the method, or a conclusion the evidence does not support, point to the specific problem. If you are right, I will say so and correct it. And I expect you to do the same. So "If she's so damn stable, why do you never carry full sail?" ...Maybe you have not see all of the videos? And maybe your boat can carry full sail when it's blowing 35 knots. And you are more than welcome to take the same collection of clips I gave to AI for analysis and run it yourself. The video clips are right here: https://svseeker.com/videos/1495.html

"YOU HEAR THAT, DUG? I DARE YOU TO PUBLISH THE FULL RESULTS" -- Yes, I can even imagine you screaming it like a Karen. And I will be happy to oblige.

Sailing Anarchy

Related Encyclopedia

Comments

3D Printer

Videos and images